Archive for November, 2011
I’ve mentioned before how I’ve listened to my share of Oasis, and have had most of their albums in one form or another. Recently, I’ve even gone so far as to add a few albums to my “play at work” stack of playlists for, well, playing while I’m at work. Maybe that’s what triggered my awareness when, one day, after firing up iTunes to do the usual “Let’s see what’s new, and if there’s actually anything worth looking into coming out” that I’ve started doing once or twice a week, I discovered a little gem: Noel Gallagher’s High Flying Birds. I clicked “buy” with only a moment’s hesitation (read: the time it took to move the cursor and click a button), and have been listening to it quite regularly ever since (mostly, you guessed it, at work).
And that’s really the only issue I have with the album – most of the listening I’ve done has been while at work. And since it’s been to a digital copy, I couldn’t really tell you particular tracks that stand out to me like I could if I were constantly looking at a CD case… but that’s also the beauty of the album. It’s not that it’s a collection of songs, really, as much as it is a flowing musical experience much like Green Day’s American Idiot or 21st Century Breakdown, or most Pink Floyd albums. Overall, an album I would highly encourage you to check out. And as a sample, here’s this week’s MVM selection…
Almost six weeks ago, I subjected myself to the beast that can be lovingly referred to as the GRE in English Literature. The idea behind the exam: how well do you know the English Literature cannon of (mostly) dead white guys (mainly) from England, covering circa 400-ish (Beowulf) until the early 20th Century? It’s a 230-question, multiple-choice exam that is administered in one fat 170-minute block of time. Sample questions include things such as: (given an excerpted passage from a work) “What [figure/historical event/etc.] is this passage alluding to in [lines x-y]?” or “Based on the style of this passage, it is evident that the author also wrote which of the following?”
I will admit, I only spent a few weeks prior to taking the test devoting any significant time to preparing for the exam, based on the following:
1) There is only one school that I am applying to that requires the exam for admission.
2) 2,000 years of Western Literature in 230 questions? Most of the works are things that I’ve only been subjected to in academic settings, and had problems connecting with when I HAD to read it, how the hell am I supposed to gain any insight when I’m only interested in something enough to review for a test? No matter how much I might actually connect with while preparing for the exam, 2,000 years is a long time, and there’s bound to be stuff that I probably wouldn’t remember even if I were able to spend significant time reading exclusively for the test.
3) My areas on interest, and regular reading, are principally from within the last 100 years, and are not things that would pop up on a “traditional” literary cannon, and while I appreciate familiarity with past literary works, styles and story elements, lots of things have changed in the publishing and readership circles of today’s world since, say, when Dickens or Swift or Coleridge were writing. Great writers to learn story, characterization, or setting from, no doubt, but any insight gained (beyond story) would have to be tempered by the fact that contemporary fiction is written so stylistically different now.
To prepare for this beast of an exam I popped over to the local Barnes & Nobles Test Prep section and picked up one of those “guides to the exam” that includes strategies, supplemental study material and a sample test. The registration for the exam also included an “official” sample exam. So I ended up taking this thing not just once, but three times in all. The first time, after only the initial review information in the prep book, I weighed in at an adjusted score of 420 (of 810… lowest score is 240). A little more prep, guided by reviewing the supplemental answer material and flipping through the Norton Anthologies I still have from my undergraduate days and I jumped up to a 520.
But here’s the thing. Both times, I completed the entire exam (all 230 questions) in the allotted time, and the adjusted scores reflect the “guessing penalty.” So here’s how scoring works. For every one you get right, you get a point. For everyone that you don’t answer, you get nothing. But for every one that you answer incorrectly, you are docked a quarter of a point. See where this is going yet? On both of the practice exams, answering all of the questions I had at least 90 that I answered incorrectly (123 on the first attempt)…
When I took the test for real, I’m not sure if I was slightly burned from the studying, or if the test was that much harder than the practice exams, but I didn’t even come close to answering all 230 questions. My best guess puts me at leaving at least 50 blank, if not more. When I got my official scores in the mail this past week, turns out I landed about in the middle of the practice exams – a 480.
Considering that I left so many questions blank, not too bad overall. Do I see myself taking the exam again in the future? Probably not. It was only for one school anyway, and it’s not the only school I am applying to.
A quick note to let you all know that I am still here, but have been tied up trying to finalize applications for PhD and MFA programs… more on that to come when I get them all submitted…
Until then, though… some services may be in flux, but should resume once the applications are done.